School Leadership Organizations

Education News

Blog powered by Typepad

« Schmoker lambasts complex teacher evals (like KY's) | Main | KY school accountability scores go public Nov 2 with problematic percentile rankings »

10/21/2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tim McClung

You mentioned homeschooling at the end of this post and I was curious if you had read Clark Aldrich's book,
Unschooling Rules: 55 Ways to Unlearn What We Know About Schools and Rediscover Education?

Speaking of dramatic shifts, what about Kim Farris-Berg's new book about teachers having full autonomy.

http://www.educationevolving.org/blog/2012/10/announcing-release-of-trusting-teachers-with-school-success

Gary Houchens

Tim I'm not familiar with either of these books but will definitely take a look. Thanks for the recommendations!

Joanne

This is a VERY powerful post. Thank you for your leadership.

Jennifer Adams

Another book to add:

"Teaching Minds"

Bob Collier

You might be interested in the work of Judy Breck. Sadly, she died last year, but her websites are still online.

http://handschooling.com/

http://www.goldenswamp.com/

John Stewart

As a teacher, I can imagine how school has developed to deliver learning, but that technology has now developed to do the same thing outside of schools. (Of course, families are still going to need daycare.)
However, the fact that both mom and dad has to work now, that health care costs more, that employment isn't steady and that there are a lot more single moms are all reasons why school has become so much more expensive and that achievement has not grown.
The increase in school spending matches the decline in parenting that used to be done at home.

Gary Houchens

John, I think you raise a good point. The decline of the family has definitely made the work of education harder. I also think a key factor is that the mission and purpose of education has changed dramatically in recent decades, from ranking and sorting students to trying to ensure every child reaches proficiency in core skills and knowledge. It stands to reason that a lot more resources would be required for this new mission and that success would be much harder to reach.

I think Elmore's point, though (at least as I interpret it) is that the problem isn't a lack of resources but that the structures of schooling are still organized for the old purpose of Education and will never succeed, no matter how much money we spend. Moreover, institutional and policy structures help ensure that the system will never change, and therefore will ultimately fail.

Bruce Smith

Given your interest in "seemingly radical" approaches, I wonder if you have studied the Sudbury model. I blog about Sudbury and other topics at http://writelearning.wordpress.com, and the original Sudbury school has a rich website at www.sudval.org. Dr. Peter Gray also writes a Sudbury-friendly blog called Freedom to Learn at the Psychology Today website (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn).

I would very much like to connect with you regarding this post and our respective professional paths.

Gary Houchens

Hi, Bruce. I've actually just only recently learned about the Sudbury model and would be eager to find out more. E-mail me at gary.houchens@wku.edu so we can discuss further.

Barry Kort

Apostasy is the new normal in many traditional cultural models and practices.

TGrant

As a joyful advocate of the Montessori model, I can wholehearted agree with this post. Intelligence is not rare, and our children are born ready to learn. Impressions do not just enter the child's mind, they literally form it.

Sally Goddard Blythe, director of the Institute for Neuro-Physiological Psychology, has said that "each child's brain is designed to follow an orderly, predictable inter-related sequence of development, facilitated through maturation and entrained through interaction with the environment." Our job, as adults, is to provide the kind of activities and environments that can accurately match biologically driven requisites during each stage of development.

Absolutely amazing things happen when we are able to do this!!!

Michael Strong

It is great to see someone from within the establishment acknowledge so frankly the limitations of the existing model. I've worked in public schools and created both private and charter schools, and I've concluded that the structure itself prevents deep reforms from taking place.

See my sequence of guest posts at the "Bleeding Heart Libertarians" blog for a vision for how we can help all children going forward,

http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/tag/education/

Dirk Wright

http://www.sudval.org/

The original Sudbury School. Everything you wanted to know about the model can be found there or at similar schools. We are starting one in Virginia.

Mike Sadofsky

Yes indeed, I'll cast another vote for Sudbury Valley School http://www.sudval.org (and schools like it - you can find links to many of them at the SVS website) as an effective model for the future.

Terry Freeman

I notice that Larry Cuban - a researcher who strongly supports government provision of education - nonetheless reports that reform efforts have been hugely unsuccessful.

Is it time to ask if the entire model is wrong, from top-to-bottom, because of the Economic Calculation Problem? That is, can a bureaucratic structure properly respond to new knowledge, new technology, new experiences?

A few years back, I happened to look at an Amish classroom, which is very similar to any government classroom in America - or, for that matter, almost all private-school classrooms. I thought to myself, if the provision of transportation had improved at the same pace, we'd now be driving blinged-out horse-drawn buggies, equipped with spinner rims and GPS systems, but still traveling at the same plodding pace provided by one- or two-horsepower of the old-fashioned four-footed variety.

For 150 years, we've experimented with government control of education. Why not unshackle the amazing creative powers of children, teachers, and parents?

Gary Houchens

Tim, thanks for your comments. I'm with you - the model of traditional schooling is very difficult to break, and even most non-governmental models just replicate the same structure. But consumer demand will cause an eventual shift, and government-run schools are ill-equipped to respond. Let's empower families to make their own educational choices, and we'll have a much better shot at flourishing innovations.

AtlasEdLearning

Until schools begin to cater to individuals as the marketplace does, they will fail. The industrial age is over. Fitting into a box to get that secure, well paying career is over.

Students seek a customized education since everything else in their lives is customized to their interests and their needs. Education will need to implode and be rebuilt to allow for flexibility, autonomy, and freedom to pursue individual goals.

Many of us have left teaching for those same reasons. Unfortunately, students don't have that choice.

Charter schools and Common Core are not a fix. They are merely a spin on traditional schooling. Until true freedoms for students and teachers are implemented, there will be no improvement.

Terry Freeman

One of my takeaways from the Wired article about Correa's class is this: ten of his students jumped to the 99.99th percentile rank on Mexico's standardized math test. Were they all direct lineal descendants of Karl Friedrich Gauss? I think not. I think they learned a lot more math than their peers, a lot more quickly, a lot more deeply.

This doesn't surprise me. I homeschooled my two children, and they homeschool their nine. One might argue that I have "good math genes" which passed along very nicely to both children and grandchildren, but still - one of my grandsons knew the following at age 6: negative numbers, fractions, decimals, exponents, binary arithmetic, and cryptography. He could do all the arithmetic which is known by high school graduates, and in just two more years (at age 8) tested at the 18th grade equivalent on the Woodcock Johnson math tests.

Home schoolers in general tend to score well above national averages. The larger the numbers, the less plausible the "self-selection" or "cream-skimming" hypotheses.

More to the point, if you watch what home-schoolers actually do, you'll see something qualitatively different. Their methods are highly adaptive; they take into account the abilities and interests of the individual child; they are fast and efficient. Children, in short, are treated as budding geniuses - and many respond very well. These results are robust, not dependent upon socio-economic status.

Another way to look at it is this: home-school parents are doing what parents of high-socioeconomic status tend to do already: read to their children, have conversations with their children, talk informally about math and other topics on a frequent basis. These small and frequent nudges tend to have a large cumulative impact. Home schoolers consciously practice what others might already do as a matter of habit and cultural upbringing.

I don't believe my parents set out to create a math whiz, but some of my earliest memories about math involve counting and making rolls of 50 pennies. My mother gave me a few tips about how to count in groups of 2 and 10, which stuck. I never had any problem with the "place value" concept.

JS

While the form and structure of the learning process is important, the greatest break-down in our nation's education system is hi lighted in a woman's comment from above, that families will still need daycare due to increased living expenses. I cannot state strongly enough that the view that school was ever supposed to be any sort of day care is inherently wrong. Families are supposed to raise children, not institutions. And, families are not forced to become 2 income families due to increased costs of basics but increased ideas of what basics are. Americans have forgotten what is most important in life and the raising of children. A second income to pay for what we think are basics is what needs to change. More families together. That's what raises children well.

E Tavit

I appreciate the comments here by Elmore, and would like to point out that John Holt spoke out against the usefulness of compulsory public education from 1967 until his death in 1985. Holt has published more than 10 books on this topic, and associated with A. S Neill and the formation of the Sudbury school referred to in an earlier post. I left my teaching job last year to homeschool our 2 children in responsive to the totally ineffecitve and archic model of education to which our millions of students are subjected. The death of public education would liberate our kids. A future with out compulsory publiceducation has endless possibilites. Thanks for the discussion. BT

Ellen Pitts

I have looked at the Sudbury School model in the past and recognize the potential for such a program. While its easy to see the problems with institutionalized education, solutions are what have been scarce. I like the Sudbury model because it is inexpensive (tuition is in line with what publics spend per student) and so could be run as a charter. With the median income of American households at $50k, homeschooling as a norm is not really going anywhere.

Mike

Good post. Have you read The Leipzig Connection?

Institutional schooling was never about education.

Also see www.TheUlimateHistoryLesson.com for a weekend with John Taylor Gatto.

Mike

* Sorry, typo: www.TheUltimateHistoryLesson.com

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

My Photo